General warehousing and storage · Texas

Dallas Fastener, Inc.

Grand Prairie, TX · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dallas Fastener, Inc. runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

Dallas Fastener, Inc.: 4.6 TCR = 80% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dallas Fastener, Inc. safety composite

Dallas Fastener, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2024

Dallas Fastener, Inc. injury rate improved

Dallas Fastener, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Grand Prairie, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #614/846
  • PHOTO 010000 - Woodman War…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 010000 - Woodman Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dallas Fastener, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dallas Fastener, Inc. averages 4.6 TCR (80% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dallas Fastener, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Dallas Fastener, Inc. falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #614 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Dallas Fastener, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dallas Fastener, Inc.
Dallas Fastener, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dallas Fastener, Inc. has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 10.6 8.0 4 0 0
2018 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 9.3 9.3 3 0 0
2016 4.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Grand Prairie

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 010000 - Woodman Warehouse 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dillard's, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKC6 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC 47 - Riverside 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR 4007 - Rochester Nail Plant 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradley Il - 3093 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Forest Grove Light & Power 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Chicago Meat 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond Steel Rule Dies, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Signature Stone 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Skeetclub 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Concrete 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.