Residential property managing · Ohio

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls

Cuyahoga Falls, OH · ~49 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential property managing workplace, earning a grade F.

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls: 4.5 TCR = 318% of Residential property managing BLS 1.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls safety composite

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls injury rate improved

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls's TCR fell 2.4 from 5.8 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Cuyahoga Falls, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 318% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #22/48
  • PHOTO Bear Creek
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bear Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls averages 4.5 TCR (318% of the Residential property managing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 1.4

Where Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls falls in its industry

500 Residential property managing establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 48 Residential property managing employers in Ohio.

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls (49 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls
Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls (49 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Danbury Woods Cuyahoga Falls has fewer employees than the Residential property managing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2023 7.4 3.7 2 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.4 3.7 2 0 0
2019 10.2 10.2 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.8 3.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · OH · Cuyahoga Falls

500 Residential property managing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 105 employers in Cuyahoga Falls, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bear Creek 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurus Home Care - Grand Ledge 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arlington Properties, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cassidy Maintenance Corp 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 6 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Ohio Transmission SC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Contracting & Engineering, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanley Miller Construction Co Main 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOJO Lippman Campus 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR WESTERN RESERVE HOSPITAL, LLC 826 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOJO Industries, Inc. - Lippman Campus 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alside Window Company - Central 580 FTE
NAT-TCR Dudek & Bock Spring Manufacturing Co 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Polyurethane Specialties Company 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaord - Buford Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CTG Leasing 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mainplace Senior Living 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0464 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0262 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0039 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.