Natural gas pipeline construction · Connecticut

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut

Norwalk, CT · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Natural gas pipeline construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut: 4.2 TCR = 149% of Natural gas pipeline construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut safety composite

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut: 4.3 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.23× in 2020

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut's TCR rose 0.8 from 4.3 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Norwalk, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 149% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Evans & Associates U…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evans & Associates Utility Services, Inc. - Oklahoma City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut averages 4.2 TCR (149% of the Natural gas pipeline construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=3 · 2018=4 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=5.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut falls in its industry

809 Natural gas pipeline construct establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Natural gas pipeline construct employers in Connecticut.

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut (61 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut
Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut (61 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Danella Construction Corporation of Connecticut has fewer employees than the Natural gas pipeline construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2019 4.5 2.2 2 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2016 4.3 1.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · CT · Norwalk

809 Natural gas pipeline construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 140 employers in Norwalk, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evans & Associates Utility Services, Inc. - Oklahoma City 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAW-PENSACOLA 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KS Energy Services (Pana) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brave Oilfield Services, LLC 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Electric Division 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strategic Commercial Realty, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kim Industries Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newman's Own, Inc 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norwalk Hospital 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norwalk Public Schools 1,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR WLWAH 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Coast Enterprises, LLC 689 FTE
NAT-TCR The Parts House Loc 6 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Emergency Medical Services 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Somerset Welding & Steel Company Inc.- Dump Plant 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ee&G Management Services, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Little Rock Ak 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Aluminum 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kemira Chemicals, Atlanta R&D 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barlovento, LLC 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.