Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

DanHil San Angelo

San Angelo, TX · ~83 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DanHil San Angelo runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

DanHil San Angelo: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DanHil San Angelo safety composite

DanHil San Angelo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DanHil San Angelo: 1.1 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

DanHil San Angelo's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · San Angelo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/102
  • PHOTO Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DanHil San Angelo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DanHil San Angelo averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DanHil San Angelo TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where DanHil San Angelo falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 102 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Texas.

DanHil San Angelo (83 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate DanHil San Angelo
DanHil San Angelo (83 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

DanHil San Angelo has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.8 1.9 5 0 0
2017 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · San Angelo

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 154 employers in San Angelo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Target Container) Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden City Container 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta Food Service Packaging 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BTA Oil Producers, LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE ODESSA SVC CTR 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Durotech Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Restoration of Texas 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shannon Medical Center 2,449 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ethicon Inc San Angelo 690 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Grill 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lone Star Beef Processors 660 FTE
NAT-TCR Datwyler Pharma Packaging USA Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SBS South Floria (Miami Lakes) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Inline Plastics Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Walters-Morgan Construction, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rand Graphics - Hoover 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion Manufacturing 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardan - Hortonville 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reese Wholesale - Indy 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.