Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

DanHil Temple

Temple, TX · ~140 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DanHil Temple runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

DanHil Temple: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DanHil Temple safety composite

DanHil Temple scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DanHil Temple: 1.3 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.18× in 2024

DanHil Temple's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Temple, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #74/102
  • PHOTO NORTHAMPTON, MA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NORTHAMPTON, MA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DanHil Temple in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DanHil Temple averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DanHil Temple TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.9 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where DanHil Temple falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 102 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Texas.

DanHil Temple (140 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate DanHil Temple
DanHil Temple (140 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

DanHil Temple has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2022 2.9 1.2 5 0 0
2021 3.5 2.4 6 0 0
2020 4.6 3.5 7 1 0
2019 3.0 1.8 5 0 0
2018 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2017 8.0 1.2 13 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TX · Temple

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 177 employers in Temple, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NORTHAMPTON, MA 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HANOVER, PA 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Mount Vernon Container 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA110 Modesto Container 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8281-Dow Deer Park 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patin Construction LLC 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Bend Solar Project 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mcmahon Contracting L.P. 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple 5,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott & White Memorial Hospital 4,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Health 4,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLINIC-TEMPLE REGION 1,633 FTE
NAT-TCR 174- Birmingham Marriott 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Party Rental 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Del0000444 Workforce Initiatives 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR C462 Bryson City 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #77 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #79 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8683 KAO Eastvale 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Health Foundation of MA, Inc. D/B/A The Bostonian Nursing Care & Rehabilitation Center 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.