Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions · Illinois

Danville Forge and Corporate Office

Danville, IL · ~141 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Danville Forge and Corporate Office runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions workplace, earning a grade B.

Danville Forge and Corporate Office: 4.0 TCR = 75% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Danville Forge and Corporate Office safety composite

Danville Forge and Corporate Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Danville Forge and Corporate Office: 2.4 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2018

Danville Forge and Corporate Office's TCR rose 3.3 from 2.4 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Danville, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 75% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #25/35
  • PHOTO Volvo Group Trucks O…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Danville Forge and Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Danville Forge and Corporate Office averages 4.0 TCR (75% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Danville Forge and Corporate Office TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=5.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Danville Forge and Corporate Office falls in its industry

320 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 35 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Illinois.

Danville Forge and Corporate Office (141 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Danville Forge and Corporate Office
Danville Forge and Corporate Office (141 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Danville Forge and Corporate Office has fewer employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.7 3.5 8 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · IL · Danville

320 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 112 employers in Danville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1894 LKQ Newnan (GPS) 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Truck Parts Company 39 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Univance Inc 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE American Dream Home Improvement, Inc. 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Samron Midwest Contracting 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE PMI Energy Solutions LLC 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Climate Pros-Glendale Heights-Brandon 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDWEST 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR KIK Custom Products 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sacred Heart Medical Center 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC 300625 DANVILLE PLT 525 FTE
NAT-TCR ACCO Brands - Pleasant Prairie DC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Baytown Nursing and Rehab Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2077-Us Dd Nw Kearny Branch 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Montgomery, AL (PDC) 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wooldridge Place Nursing 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edwards Wood Products - Transportation 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Lake Rehabilitation Center 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summers County ARH 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.