Commercial building construction general contractors · Nebraska

Darland Construction

Omaha, NE · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Darland Construction runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Darland Construction: 0.4 TCR = 14% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Darland Construction safety composite

Darland Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Darland Construction held a steady TCR band

Darland Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/52
  • PHOTO The Haskell Company
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Haskell Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Darland Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Darland Construction averages 0.4 TCR (14% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Darland Construction TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Darland Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 52 Commercial building constructi employers in Nebraska.

Darland Construction (38 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Darland Construction
Darland Construction (38 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Darland Construction has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NE · Omaha

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Haskell Company 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Baltimore 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tishman Construction Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BJC - Medical Center Campus Renewal 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE R Lazy K Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Papillion W 6th St (NE010) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy Center Omaha 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Anderson Constructors 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Hayward 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Virtual Employees 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Genie TREQ Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HCAIV01 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Country Green Turf Farms - Olympia 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE FirstKey Homes LLC - Fort Myers / Tampa 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fugro USA Land - Rapid City 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Composites One LLC - Ft Worth 905 Railhead 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.