Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise · Colorado

Dart Logistics Services - Denver

Commerce City, CO · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Logistics Services - Denver runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

Dart Logistics Services - Denver: 6.2 TCR = 107% of Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Logistics Services - Denver safety composite

Dart Logistics Services - Denver scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dart Logistics Services - Denver: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 19.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2023

Dart Logistics Services - Denver's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Commerce City, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 107% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #62/100
  • PHOTO 425
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 425 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Dart Logistics Services - Denver in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Logistics Services - Denver averages 6.2 TCR (107% of the Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Logistics Services - Denver TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=19.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Dart Logistics Services - Denver falls in its industry

9,477 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 100 Public warehousing and storage employers in Colorado.

Dart Logistics Services - Denver (52 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Logistics Services - Denver
Dart Logistics Services - Denver (52 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dart Logistics Services - Denver has fewer employees than the Public warehousing and storage (except s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2020 19.4 14.6 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CO · Commerce City

9,477 Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 175 employers in Commerce City, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 425 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontgate Marketing West Chester 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building 12 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Tire - Store 44 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4M Feeders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alamosa Service Center-805 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lobato Construction LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keene Concrete, Inc. 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR CODEN - COMMERCE CITY 3,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR COMMERCE CITY (CODEN) 3,174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Q3 Contracting Inc 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDU5 581 FTE
NAT-TCR Cellofoam-Sallisaw, OK-ROTO/FAB (NonEPS) 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HC North Central Missouri Macon 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Transport-Portland 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR C0289 Anderson 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE A1 Desert Electric Co. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE KMS South Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sirois Tool Co., Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wright Architectural Millwork Corporation 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.