Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise · California

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC

Ontario, CA · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC: 1.0 TCR = 17% of Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC safety composite

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2020

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC injury rate improved

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #95/1131
  • PHOTO Building 56
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Building 56 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC averages 1.0 TCR (17% of the Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC TCR series: 2018=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC falls in its industry

9,477 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 1131 Public warehousing and storage employers in California.

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC (23 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC
Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC (23 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dart Warehouse Corporation - DDC has fewer employees than the Public warehousing and storage (except s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Ontario

9,477 Public warehousing and storage (except self storage), general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Building 56 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hollingsworth USPS Martinsburg 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR College Park - 4965 Stonewall Tell Road 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylored Services LLC - Savannah 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln FS (SSS,SHS) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GlaxoSmithKline 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maryville, MO 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1005 Tukwila, WA 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain- Bloomingburg 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE D2 Materials Labs (Rockford & Moline) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain - East St. Louis 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 412 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.