Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · North Carolina

DataWatt Solutions, Inc.

Linwood, NC · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. runs at 235% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade F.

DataWatt Solutions, Inc.: 6.6 TCR = 235% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. safety composite

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2019

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. injury rate improved

DataWatt Solutions, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 6.9 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Linwood, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 235% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #72/79
  • PHOTO Laser Underground
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Laser Underground (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DataWatt Solutions, Inc. averages 6.6 TCR (235% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · BLS 2.8

Where DataWatt Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 79 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in North Carolina.

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DataWatt Solutions, Inc.
DataWatt Solutions, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

DataWatt Solutions, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 15.1 3.8 3 1 0
2016 6.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NC · Linwood

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Linwood, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Laser Underground 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patriot Towers, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Fresno-N Armstrong Avenue 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMMA2 - Marion, IA 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Brothers Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strickland Farms Payroll 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE James B. Morris Farms, Inc, 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTL, LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linwood/Lexington 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Owens & Minor/Halyard Health 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lexington Plant 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR RHB - LIN 88 FTE
NAT-TCR Alside Supply Center #170 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730210-CS 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NDX Bauer 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NDX Florida 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dart Trucking Inc., Kenova, Wv 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sierra Ambulance Service, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eventures, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE BOLLIG 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.