Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) · California

David A.Bush, Inc.

Hanford, CA · ~62 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

David A.Bush, Inc. runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade B.

David A.Bush, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 58% of Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

David A.Bush, Inc. safety composite

David A.Bush, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

David A.Bush, Inc. injury rate improved

David A.Bush, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Hanford, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/78
  • PHOTO Anderson Construction
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anderson Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

David A.Bush, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows David A.Bush, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (58% of the Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

David A.Bush, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where David A.Bush, Inc. falls in its industry

924 Construction management, indus establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 78 Construction management, indus employers in California.

David A.Bush, Inc. (62 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate David A.Bush, Inc.
David A.Bush, Inc. (62 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

David A.Bush, Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, industrial buil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.9 6.3 5 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · Hanford

924 Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 118 employers in Hanford, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anderson Construction 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walter S. Johnson Building Co., Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bracken Construction Company, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olaf Anderson Construction, Inc. 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zipper Farms, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crain Marketing, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maricopa Orchards, LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTLAND ORCHIDS 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daniel C. Salas Harvesting Inc. 2,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanford Community Hospital 1,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHHF001 - HOSPITAL 1,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR A.M. AG ENTERPRISE, INC. 976 FTE
NAT-TCR Ellenby Technologies, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Toshiba Business Solutions - Eagan 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Jacksonville 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Janitorial Management Services 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Youngwood Shop n Save 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vocational services, Inc. Shop #3 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE D & R Specialties, Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Hills Living and Rehabilitation Center 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.