Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Utah

Davis Conference Center

Layton, UT · ~107 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Davis Conference Center runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Davis Conference Center: 7.8 TCR = 262% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Davis Conference Center safety composite

Davis Conference Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2021→2024

Davis Conference Center injury rate improved

Davis Conference Center's TCR fell 9.6 from 13.6 in 2021 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=13.6 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Layton, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 262% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #81/107
  • PHOTO Aloft San Francisco …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aloft San Francisco Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Davis Conference Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Davis Conference Center averages 7.8 TCR (262% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Davis Conference Center TCR series: 2021=13.6 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Davis Conference Center falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 107 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Utah.

Davis Conference Center (107 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Davis Conference Center
Davis Conference Center (107 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Davis Conference Center has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 4.8 1.9 5 0 0
2022 9.1 0.0 4 0 0
2021 13.6 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · UT · Layton

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 75 employers in Layton, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aloft San Francisco Airport 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corolla Classic Vacation 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Corpus Christi 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reunion Resort 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00527 SALT LAKE SERV CTR 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Salt Lake City 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 353 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLG - Litho Flexo 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Young Automotive Group 951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Layton Hospital 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 796-DC796 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1699 403 FTE
NAT-TCR Decatur County 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aloft San Francisco Airport 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Republic National Industries of Georgia, LP 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunshine Health and Rehab 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cornerstone Delivery Service 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tarrant Area Food Bank 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4600-Canopy San Antonio Riverwalk 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCP Transportation, Inc. 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.