Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local · Florida

Davis Mail Services, Inc

Jacksonville, FL · ~371 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Davis Mail Services, Inc runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local workplace, earning a grade D.

Davis Mail Services, Inc: 8.5 TCR = 188% of Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Davis Mail Services, Inc safety composite

Davis Mail Services, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Davis Mail Services, Inc: 4.9 → 37.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 37.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.23× in 2024

Davis Mail Services, Inc's TCR rose 32.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 37.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Jacksonville, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 188% of ind

  • DART 18.9 DART
  • RANK #93/111
  • PHOTO BATON ROUGE (LAPAL)
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~371 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BATON ROUGE (LAPAL) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Davis Mail Services, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Davis Mail Services, Inc averages 8.5 TCR (188% of the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Davis Mail Services, Inc TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=3.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=37.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Davis Mail Services, Inc falls in its industry

2,784 Bulk mail truck transportation establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 111 Bulk mail truck transportation employers in Florida.

Davis Mail Services, Inc (371 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Davis Mail Services, Inc
Davis Mail Services, Inc (371 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Davis Mail Services, Inc has more employees than the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 37.8 18.9 4 0 0
2023 4.2 3.6 29 0 0
2022 3.5 3.0 21 0 0
2021 4.6 4.0 23 0 0
2020 5.2 4.3 12 0 0
2019 3.9 3.2 17 0 0
2017 3.6 3.1 14 0 0
2016 4.9 2.6 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · FL · Jacksonville

2,784 Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BATON ROUGE (LAPAL) 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ward Trucking LLC-Raleigh 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAE Columbia Lot 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NJ_Burlington_15 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 1851 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michaels Distribution Center #1827 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE VNA of the Treasure Coast 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Sunrise 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR 1586 PYP Washington PArk 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR OHI 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MH Sioux Falls 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1394 - Cumming 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coffeyville Resources Refining and Marketing 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE DLC Resources 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2456 - Otsego 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions 371 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.