Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Texas

Davis Metal Stamping Inc.

Dallas, TX · ~91 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. runs at 362% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Davis Metal Stamping Inc.: 11.9 TCR = 362% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. safety composite

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2023

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. injury rate improved

Davis Metal Stamping Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 6.2 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 46.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=10.0 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=46.0 · 2023=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 362% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #21/22
  • PHOTO Compco Columbiana
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Compco Columbiana (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Davis Metal Stamping Inc. averages 11.9 TCR (362% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=10 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=4 · 2022=46 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Davis Metal Stamping Inc. falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 22 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Texas.

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. (91 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Davis Metal Stamping Inc.
Davis Metal Stamping Inc. (91 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Davis Metal Stamping Inc. has more employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 5.8 6 0 0
2022 46.0 46.0 5 0 0
2021 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 5 0 0
2019 7.8 2.9 7 1 0
2018 10.0 6.3 8 0 0
2017 10.7 4.6 7 0 0
2016 6.2 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · TX · Dallas

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Compco Columbiana 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovative Technologies Corp. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wedge Products 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FlexTM_Wahpeton 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Texas Oilfield Solutions, LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quadvest LP 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - North Central Texas 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leyendecker Builders & Contractors, Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR TIS - VA - Culpeper 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG523 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR West Mont 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-00091 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saugatuck Brewing Company 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homecare Gainesville 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medical Murray 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100037 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.