Sprinkler system, building, installation · New York

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc

Amherst, NY · ~909 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sprinkler system, building, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc: 1.6 TCR = 59% of Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc safety composite

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc injury rate improved

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc's TCR fell 1.3 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Amherst, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #71/297
  • PHOTO ATech Refrigeration
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~909 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATech Refrigeration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc averages 1.6 TCR (59% of the Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, in establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 297 Sprinkler system, building, in employers in New York.

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc (909 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc
Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc (909 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Davis-Ulmer Sprinkler Company Inc has more employees than the Sprinkler system, building, installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.4 15 0 0
2023 1.1 0.5 11 0 0
2022 0.9 0.4 6 1 0
2020 2.2 1.6 8 0 0
2016 2.6 1.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NY · Amherst

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 112 employers in Amherst, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATech Refrigeration 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Mechanical Contractors, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Condor Fire Spinkler Co., LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Russell Plumbing and Heating 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SWF1 908 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Wartburg Adult Community 908 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tarrytown Site 911 FTE
STATE-SIZE 71990 911 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Alberta Dr 082 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alberta Drive 564 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Niagara Falls 086 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Niagara Falls Blvd 445 FTE
NAT-TCR SiVance LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SICPA Securink Corp. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Huffman's Farm & Home - Fort Madison, IA 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MWC Regional Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spring Hill LOC 909 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chick-N-Quick Plant 909 FTE
NAT-SIZE Euclid Hospital 909 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital Ardmore 909 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.