Seismograph exploration (except surveying) for oil and gas on a contract basis · Texas

Dawson Geophysical Company

Midland, TX · ~189 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dawson Geophysical Company runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Seismograph exploration (except surveying) for oil and gas on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade B.

Dawson Geophysical Company: 1.2 TCR = 63% of Seismograph exploration (except surveying) for oil and gas on a contract basis BLS 1.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dawson Geophysical Company safety composite

Dawson Geophysical Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dawson Geophysical Company: 0.8 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Dawson Geophysical Company's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.8 in 2021 to 2.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.2 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #132/196
  • PHOTO HES Artesia, NM (Nor…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HES Artesia, NM (North Yard) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dawson Geophysical Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dawson Geophysical Company averages 1.2 TCR (63% of the Seismograph exploration (except surveying) for oil and gas on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dawson Geophysical Company TCR series: 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.9

Where Dawson Geophysical Company falls in its industry

467 Seismograph exploration (excep establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #132 safest of 196 Seismograph exploration (excep employers in Texas.

Dawson Geophysical Company (189 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Dawson Geophysical Company
Dawson Geophysical Company (189 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Dawson Geophysical Company has more employees than the Seismograph exploration (except surveyin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.6 4 0 0
2023 1.8 1.1 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · TX · Midland

467 Seismograph exploration (except surveying) for oil and gas on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HES Artesia, NM (North Yard) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0067-HES Ft Lupton 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ensign Well Services - Rockies 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copper Tip Energy Services 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy Tower EN26 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAL1-DWH-DALLAS DIVISION 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanover R.S. Limited Partnership - Corporate 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lone Star Instrumentation & Electric Corporation 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR Desoto Memorial - FNS 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JLL Moderna Norwood 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Chicago/Schaumburg 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Embark Behavioral Health 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PAM Squared at Las Vegas, LLC 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metalcraft of Mayville - Beaver Dam 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Foam - Dayton 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Nashville Downtown 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.