General warehousing and storage · California

Dayton

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayton runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade F.

Dayton: 16.1 TCR = 277% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayton safety composite

Dayton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.2

2023→2024

Dayton injury rate improved

Dayton's TCR fell 32.2 from 32.2 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 32.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=32.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.1 · 277% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1105/1131
  • PHOTO 990 Savnannah DC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 990 Savnannah DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayton averages 16.1 TCR (277% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayton TCR series: 2023=32.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Dayton falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1105 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Dayton (40 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayton
Dayton (40 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Dayton has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 32.2 32.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 990 Savnannah DC 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10661 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ft Worth CCA 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pitman Warehousing 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stackhouse Brothers 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PISTACHIO HARVESTING, INC. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsonville/San Juan Bautista 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gomez Growers 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Portside of Grande Dunes 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft. Myers Field 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fryslan Ranches LLC 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Transit 16.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roadmaster Enterprises LLC dba Sturdy-Lite 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adult Basic Education 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE RBC Bremen 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ralph E. Tolbert Masonry, Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.