Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc.

Columbus, OH · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc.: 11.3 TCR = 343% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. safety composite

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.4

2016→2019

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. injury rate improved

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.4 from 17.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.0 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=16.0 · 2019=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 343% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/70
  • PHOTO CAC Corporation
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CAC Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. averages 11.3 TCR (343% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. TCR series: 2016=17 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=16 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 70 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Ohio.

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc.
Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Dayton Rogers of Ohio, Inc. has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 16.0 3.2 8 2 0
2017 10.6 6.1 6 1 0
2016 17.0 7.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · OH · Columbus

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CAC Corporation 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OMCO Solar 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middleville Tool & Die Co. 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 931 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Transmission Columbus Svc Ctr 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE JK Excavating, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brumbaugh Construction, Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moraine Office & Miscellaneous Projects 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR St Martinville Pipe & Precast 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sari Sari Store 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : AVP8 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Avante at Waynesboro 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cole 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1st Electric Contractors Inc 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE ProMach Filling Systems, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE INA-Liverpool 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.