Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator · California

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore

Livermore, CA · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator workplace, earning a grade D.

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore: 2.0 TCR = 143% of Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore safety composite

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore held a steady TCR band

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532412 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/34
  • PHOTO TPR Orange County
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TPR Orange County (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore averages 2.0 TCR (143% of the Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=6 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore falls in its industry

270 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 34 Construction machinery and equ employers in California.

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore (22 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore
Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore (22 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Dayton Superior Corporation Livermore has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment ren median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532412 · CA · Livermore

270 Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TPR Orange County 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herc Rentals 9321 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garner, Nc (147) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knoxville, Tn (M71) 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Coastal Drilling East, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Platform Beer Co. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Collar Pet Foods 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 34 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE A. Durer, Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tidewater Transit-Savannah 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tidewater Transit-Jacksonville 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Esco Laminating - Texas, Inc. 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.