Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator · California

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux

Rubidoux, CA · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator workplace, earning a grade C.

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux safety composite

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux held a steady TCR band

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532412 · Rubidoux, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/34
  • PHOTO OG&C Houston Office
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OG&C Houston Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux falls in its industry

270 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 34 Construction machinery and equ employers in California.

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux
Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Dayton Superior Corporation Rubidoux has more employees than the Construction machinery and equipment ren median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532412 · CA · Rubidoux

270 Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OG&C Houston Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennsylvania Chemicals (PChem) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NS&E Reston Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacAllister Rental Byron Center 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5580 22 FTE
NAT-TCR RenCen - Tower 500 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FXI, Inc. - Corporate Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 00525 North Temple Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baton Rouge General Hospital - Transport 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE DLP Wilson Medical Center - EVS 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital - EVS 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCHealth Highlands Ranch Hospital - EVS 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.