Licensing and permit issuance for business operations, government · Connecticut

DCP001 Consumer Protection

Hartford, CT · ~195 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DCP001 Consumer Protection runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Licensing and permit issuance for business operations, government workplace, earning a grade A.

DCP001 Consumer Protection: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Licensing and permit issuance for business operations, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DCP001 Consumer Protection safety composite

DCP001 Consumer Protection scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

DCP001 Consumer Protection injury rate improved

DCP001 Consumer Protection's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.6 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926150 · Hartford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Department of Health…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Department of Health Professions (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

DCP001 Consumer Protection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DCP001 Consumer Protection averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Licensing and permit issuance for business operations, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DCP001 Consumer Protection TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.6 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where DCP001 Consumer Protection falls in its industry

70 Licensing and permit issuance establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Licensing and permit issuance employers in Connecticut.

DCP001 Consumer Protection (195 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate DCP001 Consumer Protection
DCP001 Consumer Protection (195 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.9

DCP001 Consumer Protection has more employees than the Licensing and permit issuance for busine median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926150 · CT · Hartford

70 Licensing and permit issuance for business operations, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 270 employers in Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Department of Health Professions 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IA Alcoholic Beverages Division 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Labor & Workforce Development (28) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Labor & Industries Building 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Steel Inc. 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2544 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bristol Supermarket LLC dba ShopRite of Farmington Ave 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Naugatuck 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD HOSPITAL 7,842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital 4,674 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAZ Parking California, LLC 4,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Francis Hospital 3,165 FTE
NAT-TCR Alliance, NE (EMD) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Companies - Bingham Farms 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Energy Solutions Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 211 - Mobile 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wright Manufacturing 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williamsville Suburban, LLC 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE PADI 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food For Thought Corporate Office 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.