Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities · District of Columbia

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor

Washington, DC · ~145 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor: 2.9 TCR = 44% of Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor safety composite

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2023→2024

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor injury rate improved

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.7 in 2023 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.7 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Windsor Calallen
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsor Calallen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor averages 2.9 TCR (44% of the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor TCR series: 2023=3.7 · 2024=2 · BLS 6.5

Where Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skill establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Nursing Care Facilities Skill employers in District of Columbia.

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor (145 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor
Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor (145 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Dcwas12 Ascension Living Carroll Manor has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 2 1 0
2023 3.7 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · DC · Washington

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsor Calallen 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Misericordia Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Catherine Healthcare 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grenada Rehabilitaion & Healthcare 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4263-53381 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Hotel DC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynamic Concepts, Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100384 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Water Pollution Control Plant 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Msgul - Gulfport 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilmington Ma Distribution Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Airways Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orchard Grove Specialty Care 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyald - Ashland 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ilurb - Urbana 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cawtd - Carmel Village 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.