Commercial building construction · Florida

DeAngelis Diamond Construction

Naples, FL · ~179 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeAngelis Diamond Construction runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

DeAngelis Diamond Construction: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeAngelis Diamond Construction safety composite

DeAngelis Diamond Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2018→2024

DeAngelis Diamond Construction injury rate improved

DeAngelis Diamond Construction's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Naples, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/218
  • PHOTO Tyler Construction G…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~179 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tyler Construction Group, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

DeAngelis Diamond Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeAngelis Diamond Construction averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeAngelis Diamond Construction TCR series: 2018=0.5 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where DeAngelis Diamond Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 218 Commercial building constructi employers in Florida.

DeAngelis Diamond Construction (179 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate DeAngelis Diamond Construction
DeAngelis Diamond Construction (179 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

DeAngelis Diamond Construction has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Naples

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 359 employers in Naples, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tyler Construction Group, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Verst Burlington Pike 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watchdog Building Partners 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPR Construction - San Diego 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Complete Property Services, LLC. 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverview Operations 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elite Electrical Contractors, Inc 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masonite Yulee DFS 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naples Community Hospital, Inc. 2,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Naples 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arthrex, Inc. 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Health System North Naples Hospital 1,021 FTE
NAT-TCR Nordic PCL Construction, INC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Flintco, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Circor Aerospace & Defense 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Medtonic 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Superior Plastic Products 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana Crane & Construction, LLC 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Valley Electric Association, Fairbanks 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marshall Facility 179 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.