Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community

Asheville, NC · ~331 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community: 7.6 TCR = 201% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community safety composite

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community injury rate improved

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community's TCR fell 3.1 from 9.2 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Asheville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #75/105
  • PHOTO Prairie Senior Cotta…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~331 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prairie Senior Cottages LLC Albert Lea (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community averages 7.6 TCR (201% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community (331 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community
Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community (331 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 5.3 16 0 0
2016 9.2 9.2 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Asheville

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prairie Senior Cottages LLC Albert Lea 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Buckingham 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandywine Living at Middlebrook Crossing 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hebrew Life Choices 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE LGA Services 331 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edwards Wood Products - Marshville Plant 331 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2472 331 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1552 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Nissan New York Parts Distribution Center 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hubbell Construction Services 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Concrete Products Corp 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OAK 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The St. Regis San Francisco 331 FTE
NAT-SIZE 502 Spr1000 331 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&B Electrical & Utility Contractors Inc. 331 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dee Zee Main 331 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.