Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living

Boone, NC · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living: 6.8 TCR = 179% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living safety composite

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2021→2024

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living injury rate improved

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living's TCR fell 8.2 from 10.9 in 2021 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 91.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.9 · 2022=91.6 · 2023=81.6 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Boone, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 179% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #206/356
  • PHOTO 2248-60094
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2248-60094 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living averages 6.8 TCR (179% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living TCR series: 2021=10.9 · 2022=91.6 · 2023=81.6 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #206 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living (58 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living
Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living (58 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Deerfield Ridge Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2023 81.6 73.9 4 28 0
2022 91.6 87.2 3 39 0
2021 10.9 8.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Boone

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 38 employers in Boone, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2248-60094 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63078 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Montrose- Brookdale Senior Living 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA BERWICK 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilmington North Operations Complex 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Administration 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE TMI Services, Inc. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE North State Environmental 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watauga Medical Center, Inc. 1,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2496 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2496 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC BOONE ADM 246 FTE
NAT-TCR Solarbron Terrace 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Melissa & Doug, LLC 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Bon Air 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilkerson Elementary School 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Freightliner 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wag Services, Inc. Id 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.