Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Texas

Deerpark Facility

La Porte, TX · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deerpark Facility runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Deerpark Facility: 2.0 TCR = 97% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deerpark Facility safety composite

Deerpark Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2023

Deerpark Facility injury rate improved

Deerpark Facility's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=4.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · La Porte, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.0 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #130/292
  • PHOTO WG DAIRY SUPPLY INC …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WG DAIRY SUPPLY INC - CRESTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Deerpark Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deerpark Facility averages 2.0 TCR (97% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deerpark Facility TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=0 · 2020=4.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Deerpark Facility falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #130 safest of 292 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Texas.

Deerpark Facility (23 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Deerpark Facility
Deerpark Facility (23 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Deerpark Facility has fewer employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · La Porte

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 170 employers in La Porte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WG DAIRY SUPPLY INC - CRESTON 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Indianapolis 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chillicothe Mauser Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gregory Poole Equipment Company- Blue Ridge Road 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold, Ltd. 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold Specialty, Ltd. 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR TURN 2 Specialty Companies 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell Corp/Dacon Corp 973 FTE
NAT-TCR The gilbert Company Bloomington 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Albany Branch 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fred D. Pfening Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Country View Nursing Facility 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE WEL-Life at Elk Point 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Progressive Alloy Steels Unlimited, LLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE SORA Laboratories 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milliken - Columbia Plant 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.