Construction management, water and sewer line · Texas

Deerwood Construction, Inc.

Lubbock, TX · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deerwood Construction, Inc. runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewer line workplace, earning a grade D.

Deerwood Construction, Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 162% of Construction management, water and sewer line BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deerwood Construction, Inc. safety composite

Deerwood Construction, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2016→2022

Deerwood Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

Deerwood Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.5 from 8.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Lubbock, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #157/194
  • PHOTO Mace Avenue Project
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mace Avenue Project (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Deerwood Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deerwood Construction, Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (162% of the Construction management, water and sewer line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deerwood Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Deerwood Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 194 Construction management, water employers in Texas.

Deerwood Construction, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Deerwood Construction, Inc.
Deerwood Construction, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Deerwood Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, water and sewer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.7 8.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.8 9.8 2 0 0
2016 8.5 4.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Lubbock

1,614 Construction management, water and sewer line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mace Avenue Project 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marcellus Construction Company, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contractor Office 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR McGuirk Sand-Gravel, Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR 610 - Noblesville 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1136 - Redmond 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1165 - Coeur d'Alene 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1361 - Eureka 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Columbia Yard 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Synergy/Stevens Alternative High School 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select-Arc Troy 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Facilities 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.