Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production · California

Del Carlo Farms, Inc.

Stockton, CA · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade D.

Del Carlo Farms, Inc.: 5.5 TCR = 123% of Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. safety composite

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2017→2024

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. injury rate improved

Del Carlo Farms, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Stockton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #78/175
  • PHOTO Pacifc International…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacifc International Marketing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Del Carlo Farms, Inc. averages 5.5 TCR (123% of the Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Del Carlo Farms, Inc. falls in its industry

331 Tomato farming (except under c establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 175 Tomato farming (except under c employers in California.

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Del Carlo Farms, Inc.
Del Carlo Farms, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Del Carlo Farms, Inc. has fewer employees than the Tomato farming (except under cover), fie median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 13.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 12.3 12.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.6 6.6 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Stockton

331 Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacifc International Marketing 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR J & G Contract Labor, Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Immokalee Packing 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gold Coast Farms 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing Company Arvin 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR HandCraft Linen Services - Healthcare 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Orion Construction Corporation (Guam) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR David H. Martin Excavating, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lutheran Medical Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montgomery Facility 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Hospice 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE HPS Wilmington 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hastings Store 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.