MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Illinois

Delcom Corporation

Geneva, IL · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Delcom Corporation runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Delcom Corporation: 2.0 TCR = 53% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Delcom Corporation safety composite

Delcom Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2020

Delcom Corporation injury rate improved

Delcom Corporation's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Geneva, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/86
  • PHOTO CLINIC-COLLEGE STATI…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLINIC-COLLEGE STATION REGION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Delcom Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Delcom Corporation averages 2.0 TCR (53% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Delcom Corporation TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Delcom Corporation falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 86 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Illinois.

Delcom Corporation (69 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Delcom Corporation
Delcom Corporation (69 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Delcom Corporation has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · IL · Geneva

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 79 employers in Geneva, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLINIC-COLLEGE STATION REGION 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chagrin Falls Family Hlth Ctr 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCCC Sandusky Campus 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mile Square Health Center 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer HiBred International Inc. McLeansboro Production 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Litchfield 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2057-Centralia, IL (Monsanto Co.) 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hennepin Power Station 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Medicine Delnor Hospital 1,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kane County 1,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Of Kane 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSI Express - Geneva 330 FTE
NAT-TCR Aedd LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Defender 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Information Services Department 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VCI:VC067 - VC067-VCI - San Marcos, CA 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metric Concrete Services, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joseph Phelps Vineyards - Winery 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ovid 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sauer Group Cape Mechanical 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.