Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, and maser, manufacturing · Ohio

Delta Systems, Inc.

Streetsboro, OH · ~222 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Delta Systems, Inc. runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, and maser, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Delta Systems, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, and maser, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Delta Systems, Inc. safety composite

Delta Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Delta Systems, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.93× in 2024

Delta Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335999 · Streetsboro, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO Wire Tech Ltd. Rome
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wire Tech Ltd. Rome (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Delta Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Delta Systems, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, and maser, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Delta Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Delta Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

219 Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, a establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, a employers in Ohio.

Delta Systems, Inc. (222 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Delta Systems, Inc.
Delta Systems, Inc. (222 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Delta Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, and maser, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.7 0.4 2 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335999 · OH · Streetsboro

219 Amplifiers, magnetic, pulse, and maser, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 74 employers in Streetsboro, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wire Tech Ltd. Rome 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oztek Corp 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gonzalez Production Systems Oak Park 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Princetel, Inc. DBA Wendon Engineering 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wagner Industrial Electric 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shearer's Foods - Corporate 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle LJ Minor 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCL Design Strongsville 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Step2 Company, LLC 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Step2 Company Inc, LLC - Streetsboro, OH Site 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2313 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313 331 FTE
NAT-TCR Curtis Legal Group, A Professional Law Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Miceli Drapery Company, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Drilling & Blasting 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IP Prattville Mill 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bagcraft Packaging-Norcross 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA - Miami, Doral 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Schriever AFB Irwin Ave (1445) 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom-Pak DeWitt 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.