Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Wisconsin

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc.

Racine, WI · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc.: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. safety composite

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. held a steady TCR band

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Racine, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P92
  • PHOTO Honeywell Torrance
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Honeywell Torrance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate DeltaHawk Engines, Inc.
DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

DeltaHawk Engines, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · WI · Racine

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 111 employers in Racine, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Torrance 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney - HMC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls Royce: Excellence 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Greenville, SC 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Bay Substation East 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Service Center-5B 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE BCI Exteriors, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizon - Corporate Office 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIMIL98 1,550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Racine Offices 1,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIMIL98 ASCENSION ALL SAINTS HOSP - SPRING STREET 1,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH Industrial - Racine Offices 944 FTE
NAT-TCR Gray Construction - Lexington 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliant Techsystems Operations, LLC, DES Division 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CBI, LLC. Gulf Coast Region 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Meridian Bricks- Bessemer 166 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Electric Cooperative Services- Cleburne 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Electric Cooperative Services- Stephenville 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rasch HQ 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wabash Branch 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.