X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation

Hatfield, PA · ~180 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation: 0.8 TCR = 23% of X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation safety composite

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2019→2022

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation injury rate improved

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Hatfield, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Viken Detection
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Viken Detection (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation TCR series: 2019=1 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation falls in its industry

60 X-ray irradiation equipment ma establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 X-ray irradiation equipment ma employers in Pennsylvania.

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation (180 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation
Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation (180 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation has more employees than the X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · PA · Hatfield

60 X-ray irradiation equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 82 employers in Hatfield, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Viken Detection 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEHC : Waukesha WI (WSO), HCS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSH Headquarters Site 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accuray Incorporated - Sunnyvale CA 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gaspari Farms 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction - Pennsylvania 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE INTECH Construction, LLC 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Line Service, Inc. - Roadside Division 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hatfield Facility 2,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hatfield Main 2,089 FTE
CITY-NEAR CF Hatfield 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hatfield 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Deca 009- Ft. Belvoir 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Airflite McKinney 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Chartwell Hospitality - Black Fox Lodge 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PCI Seattle ISS 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Site 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Call Ctr 90-17-20-12 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE SKLD Beltline 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mile Square Health Center 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.