Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Virginia

Department of Military Affairs

Richmond, VA · ~401 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Department of Military Affairs runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade F.

Department of Military Affairs: 11.1 TCR = 346% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Department of Military Affairs safety composite

Department of Military Affairs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−73.3

2023→2024

Department of Military Affairs injury rate improved

Department of Military Affairs's TCR fell 73.3 from 84.4 in 2023 to 11.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 84.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=84.4 · 2024=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Richmond, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 346% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #16/18
  • PHOTO City of Alameda
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 201 inj
  • SIZE ~401 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Alameda (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Department of Military Affairs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Department of Military Affairs averages 11.1 TCR (346% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Department of Military Affairs TCR series: 2023=84.4 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Department of Military Affairs falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 18 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Virginia.

Department of Military Affairs (401 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Department of Military Affairs
Department of Military Affairs (401 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Department of Military Affairs has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 4.3 27 19 0
2023 84.4 4.9 174 172 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · VA · Richmond

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 939 employers in Richmond, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Alameda 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Bremen 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Clovis 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Government 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction & Service 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE NN Department of Public Works 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Liner Foods - Newport News 402 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds Presto Products 402 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU Health System 14,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Commonwealth University 11,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR VCU 5,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR CJW Medical Center 3,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Sail Energy LLC dba Murray Heutz Oil and Propane 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MN United 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Titan West Inc. 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wastewater Treatment Plant 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Urban Farmer LLC 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterloo (475) 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmetto General Hospital 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eventide on Eighth 401 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.