Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · Virginia

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon

Abingdon, VA · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade C.

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon safety composite

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon held a steady TCR band

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Abingdon, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/20
  • PHOTO The People Concern -…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The People Concern - Alexandria (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 20 Individual and family social s employers in Virginia.

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon
DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

DePaul Community Resources - Abingdon has fewer employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · VA · Abingdon

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 46 employers in Abingdon, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The People Concern - Alexandria 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LifeStream Services, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The People Concern - E6 Hollywood 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA of Memphis - Oxford 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowman Orchards, LLc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle W Farms II, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowman Fruit Sales LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Food City Distribution Center 845 FTE
CITY-NEAR JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Food City Support Center 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 154 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Shore Electric Corp 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecker Textiles, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrenceburg 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bilow Farms, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE K&S Millwrights LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance Concrete Products 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwood dairy Farm LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upland Fab Inc 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.