Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · California

DeSilva Gates Construction

Dublin, CA · ~676 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeSilva Gates Construction runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

DeSilva Gates Construction: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeSilva Gates Construction safety composite

DeSilva Gates Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DeSilva Gates Construction: 0.9 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

DeSilva Gates Construction's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.9 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Dublin, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #347/551
  • PHOTO Alpha Paving Industr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~676 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpha Paving Industries LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

DeSilva Gates Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeSilva Gates Construction averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeSilva Gates Construction TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where DeSilva Gates Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #347 safest of 551 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in California.

DeSilva Gates Construction (676 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DeSilva Gates Construction
DeSilva Gates Construction (676 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

DeSilva Gates Construction has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.1 13 0 0
2023 2.5 1.9 14 0 0
2022 1.9 1.4 12 0 0
2021 1.5 1.0 9 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2019 3.4 2.3 19 0 0
2017 0.9 0.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Dublin

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 78 employers in Dublin, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpha Paving Industries LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panhandle Grading & Paving, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burdick Materials 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR V.K. Knowlton Construction and Utilities Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Infinity Energy Inc. 676 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
STATE-SIZE 08881380 RGNL PA-SE 676 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mercy Hospital of Folsom 676 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 1,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-Dublin 901 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621636 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30644) 343 FTE
NAT-TCR Trinity Door Systems 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CMD Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Keats Manufacturing Company 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Heeter Printing 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Janus GA 676 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastover SC Mill 676 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nacogdoches Memorial Hospital 676 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 676 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.