Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance · Texas

Detmar Logistics LLC

San Antonio, TX · ~97 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Detmar Logistics LLC runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance workplace, earning a grade C.

Detmar Logistics LLC: 3.8 TCR = 84% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Detmar Logistics LLC safety composite

Detmar Logistics LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2017→2021

Detmar Logistics LLC injury rate improved

Detmar Logistics LLC's TCR fell 11.1 from 12.4 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #88/137
  • PHOTO BYRD'S TRUCKING LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BYRD'S TRUCKING LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Detmar Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Detmar Logistics LLC averages 3.8 TCR (84% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Detmar Logistics LLC TCR series: 2017=12.4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Detmar Logistics LLC falls in its industry

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 137 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Texas.

Detmar Logistics LLC (97 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Detmar Logistics LLC
Detmar Logistics LLC (97 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Detmar Logistics LLC has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2020 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2017 12.4 12.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · TX · San Antonio

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BYRD'S TRUCKING LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9613-0100 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR L.T. Harnett Trucking - Ashtabula 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Action Resources - Cordele 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE US Energy Development Corporation 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE ES/Well Services Division - 03 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Humble 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Betenbough Business Services 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Muhlenberg College-Catering 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Imperial Blades 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NGDS 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sisters Hosp of Buffalo-Hskpg 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta Canning Co. Inc 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE RHD Plumbing, Inc 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 225 Fencl 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.