Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) · California

Dettling Farms, Inc.

Woodland, CA · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dettling Farms, Inc. runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) workplace, earning a grade F.

Dettling Farms, Inc.: 11.2 TCR = 249% of Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dettling Farms, Inc. safety composite

Dettling Farms, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−235.1

2018→2023

Dettling Farms, Inc. injury rate improved

Dettling Farms, Inc.'s TCR fell 235.1 from 244.1 in 2018 to 8.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 244.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=244.1 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=13.9 · 2023=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111422 · Woodland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 249% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #27/33
  • PHOTO Natural Beauty Growe…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Natural Beauty Growers, LLC - Sioux Falls SD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dettling Farms, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dettling Farms, Inc. averages 11.2 TCR (249% of the Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dettling Farms, Inc. TCR series: 2018=244.1 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=13.9 · 2023=8.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Dettling Farms, Inc. falls in its industry

166 Bedding plant growing (except establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 33 Bedding plant growing (except employers in California.

Dettling Farms, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dettling Farms, Inc.
Dettling Farms, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Dettling Farms, Inc. has fewer employees than the Bedding plant growing (except vegetable median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.9 3.0 3 0 0
2021 13.9 6.9 4 0 0
2020 7.6 3.8 2 0 0
2019 14.4 0.0 3 1 0
2018 244.1 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111422 · CA · Woodland

166 Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Woodland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Natural Beauty Growers, LLC - Sioux Falls SD 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GROWER DIRECT FARMS 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunshine Floral, LLC 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Star Roses and Plants 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 800 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Woodland CA DC 1,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Sacramento DC 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030173 820 FTE
NAT-TCR Mid Maine CPL LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Boca West Country Club 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kyhar - Harlan 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-03590 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Pulp Mills Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Mechanical, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rhine Auto Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso Electric, LLC 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.