Cellulosic fiber insulation installation · Maryland

DeVere Insulation Home Performance

Glen Burnie, MD · ~40 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeVere Insulation Home Performance runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cellulosic fiber insulation installation workplace, earning a grade F.

DeVere Insulation Home Performance: 8.5 TCR = 305% of Cellulosic fiber insulation installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeVere Insulation Home Performance safety composite

DeVere Insulation Home Performance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2023

DeVere Insulation Home Performance injury rate improved

DeVere Insulation Home Performance's TCR fell 2.6 from 12.5 in 2017 to 9.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=9.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Glen Burnie, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 305% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #29/31
  • PHOTO OJ Insulation #876
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OJ Insulation #876 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

DeVere Insulation Home Performance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeVere Insulation Home Performance averages 8.5 TCR (305% of the Cellulosic fiber insulation installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeVere Insulation Home Performance TCR series: 2017=12.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=9.9 · BLS 2.8

Where DeVere Insulation Home Performance falls in its industry

1,613 Cellulosic fiber insulation in establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 31 Cellulosic fiber insulation in employers in Maryland.

DeVere Insulation Home Performance (40 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DeVere Insulation Home Performance
DeVere Insulation Home Performance (40 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

DeVere Insulation Home Performance has fewer employees than the Cellulosic fiber insulation installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.9 4.0 5 0 0
2022 13.8 9.9 7 0 0
2021 8.9 8.9 4 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 11.8 11.8 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.5 12.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · MD · Glen Burnie

1,613 Cellulosic fiber insulation installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 127 employers in Glen Burnie, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OJ Insulation #876 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wehmeier Drywall, Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Builders Installed Products #343NH 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6814_15746 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chalk Point Generating Station 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revolution Solar 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFM/Severn Associates JV 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain, LLC 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center 2,896 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDOT/MVA 1,631 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vision Technologies LLC. 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bello Mahcre 462 FTE
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply- Brownsville 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0370 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Stop & Shop Store 2613 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR South Central Kansas Medical Center 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Louisville 4401 Park Blvd 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leak Eliminators 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quikrete - Mkj 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Horse Construction 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.