Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation · Pennsylvania

Devon Electric, Inc.

Malvern, PA · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Devon Electric, Inc. runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Devon Electric, Inc.: 4.0 TCR = 144% of Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Devon Electric, Inc. safety composite

Devon Electric, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Devon Electric, Inc.: 3.3 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 13.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2020

Devon Electric, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.5 from 3.3 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Malvern, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 144% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #128/191
  • PHOTO Austin Lanehart Elec…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Austin Lanehart Electric Co., Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Devon Electric, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Devon Electric, Inc. averages 4.0 TCR (144% of the Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Devon Electric, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=3.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Devon Electric, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Control system (e.g., environm establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #128 safest of 191 Control system (e.g., environm employers in Pennsylvania.

Devon Electric, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Devon Electric, Inc.
Devon Electric, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Devon Electric, Inc. has fewer employees than the Control system (e.g., environmental, hum median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2019 13.1 10.9 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · PA · Malvern

4,550 Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 104 employers in Malvern, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Austin Lanehart Electric Co., Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.C. SCOTT ELECTRIC CO. INC. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Royal Group Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OEG INC - BENSON HS 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Rising Sun, MD) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillendale Services, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mansfield 14235 US Route 6, Mansfield, PA 16933 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Division Wilkes Barre 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Malvern, PA 5,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint-Gobain North Amerian Headquarters 1,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Malvern 1,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janssen Malvern 1,099 FTE
NAT-TCR Starved Rock Lodge and Convention Center LTD 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VMI 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR UVA Medical Center Orange 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodlawn 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Saw Works, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Prescott 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Digitech 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lumina Shared Services 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.