Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · Texas

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices

Dallas-Ft Worth, TX · ~259 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices: 6.8 TCR = 151% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices safety composite

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2016→2018

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices injury rate improved

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices's TCR fell 11.3 from 14.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.4 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Dallas-Ft Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 151% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #83/146
  • PHOTO LAS-TECHNICAL OPERAT…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LAS-TECHNICAL OPERATIONS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices averages 6.8 TCR (151% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices TCR series: 2016=14.4 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=3.2 · BLS 4.5

Where DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 146 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in Texas.

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices (259 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices
DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices (259 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

DFW - Airport United Airlines Offices has more employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.2 2.5 10 0 0
2017 2.8 2.5 9 0 0
2016 14.4 12.4 19 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · TX · Dallas-Ft Worth

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 6 employers in Dallas-Ft Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LAS-TECHNICAL OPERATIONS 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Airlines - Las Vegas Base 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - PDX 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 76040007--DFW AMER AIR WHLCH 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Victoria Jobsites 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Solar Solutions, LLC 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signet Construction, LLC 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate office 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 76040009--DFW AMER AIR CAB CLEAN 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFW DFW 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DFW 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 76040010--DFW AMER AIR RON CLEANING 130 FTE
NAT-TCR Metl-Span North Las Vegas 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Henrietta (Nyhen) 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Chillicothe (Ohchi) 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumter Center (Scsmt) 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kiel, WI Plant 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laughlin River Lodge 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans 1525 Brooks Ave 1525 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lonza/Arch - Charleston 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.