Support Activities for Air Transportation · Alaska

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks

Fairbanks, AK · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade C.

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks: 4.5 TCR = 100% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks's TCR fell 8.1 from 10.1 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.1 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Fairbanks, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 100% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #9/13
  • PHOTO Atlantic Aviation - …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlantic Aviation - SDL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks averages 4.5 TCR (100% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks TCR series: 2017=10.1 · 2018=4 · 2019=2 · 2020=2 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 13 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Alaska.

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks (43 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks
DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks (43 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : FAI - Fairbanks has fewer employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2017 10.1 8.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · AK · Fairbanks

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 161 employers in Fairbanks, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Aviation - SDL 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : PWM - Portland 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : BGR - Bangor 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR JFKCW0B75 JFK - B75 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rig 1 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copper Valley Electric Association 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASRC Builders LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103508 AAK DOWLING 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairbanks North Star Borough School District 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairbanks Memorial Hospital 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanana Chiefs Conference - All Other 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanana Chiefs Conference - CAIHC 463 FTE
NAT-TCR LA 1st Choice Auto Auction 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - High Point, NC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-631-Williams Sonoma 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Angelica - Phoenix 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : ELM - Elmira 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : GNV - Gainesville 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : HPN - White Plains 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : ITH - Ithaca 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.