Support Activities for Air Transportation · North Carolina

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville

Fayetteville, NC · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville: 2.6 TCR = 59% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville's TCR fell 8.8 from 8.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/52
  • PHOTO 5319_15022
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5319_15022 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville averages 2.6 TCR (59% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville TCR series: 2017=8.8 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 52 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in North Carolina.

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville (48 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville
DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville (48 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : FAY - Fayetteville has fewer employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 8.8 6.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NC · Fayetteville

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5319_15022 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support-OMA244 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : HSV - Huntsville 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : CHA - Chattanooga 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jones Family Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bryan Wagoner Tree Farm LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeder Operation 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Morganton Hatchery 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Churchill Living LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LA213 DeQuincy Lumber 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brake Supply Texas 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ViaQuest Foundation - Dayton 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loxley 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmer AK 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Girl Orlando 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO Joplin 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.