Support Activities for Air Transportation · Arkansas

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock

Little Rock, AR · ~132 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade A.

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock: 0.8 TCR = 18% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock held a steady TCR band

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Little Rock, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #1/12
  • PHOTO JFKPW9832 JFK - PASS…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JFKPW9832 JFK - PASSENGER SERV (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock averages 0.8 TCR (18% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.9 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 12 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Arkansas.

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock (132 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock
DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock (132 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : LIT - Little Rock has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · AR · Little Rock

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 446 employers in Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JFKPW9832 JFK - PASSENGER SERV 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAC Air - TYS 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9123-CLT-PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : BIS - Bismarck 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE IFB Solutions - Arkansas 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tube Mill 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fiocchi of America, Inc. Little Rock 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0432 LOWE S OF FAYETTEVILLE AR 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Children's Hospital 3,946 FTE
CITY-NEAR LITCX0UPS LIT - UPS 3,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT1 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock 2,500 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : BIS - Bismarck 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashland Service Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Milwaukee New Berlin VM 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin(Pwr Del-IN) 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 0392 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE cambridge Pace 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kincaid Generation LLC 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation -Raritan Center 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.