Support Activities for Air Transportation · Wisconsin

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse

La Crosse, WI · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade A.

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse: 0.9 TCR = 19% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · La Crosse, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/18
  • PHOTO JFK-SALLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JFK-SALLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse averages 0.9 TCR (19% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Wisconsin.

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse (30 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse
DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse (30 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : LSE - La Crosse has fewer employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · WI · La Crosse

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 188 employers in La Crosse, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JFK-SALLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOSCW9621 BOS - WHS BLDG 62 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : ICT - Wichita 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : SYR - Syracuse 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wayside Nurseries Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hwy 37 Farms 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Mills Complex (LMC) 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tomah Receiving 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center 3,712 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare Inc 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Clinic, Ltd. 2,127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen - La Crosse Clinic 1,739 FTE
NAT-TCR War Memorial Hospital Billing Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Sugar Grove 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin Operations and HOA 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcimoto West 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : MLU - Monroe 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recro Gainesville Development 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ward Trucking LLC-Raleigh 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 101-Tri Supply 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.