Support Activities for Air Transportation · Nebraska

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha

Omaha, NE · ~155 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha: 2.8 TCR = 62% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO Unifi Aviation Servi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Unifi Aviation Services : TVC - Traverse City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha averages 2.8 TCR (62% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.6 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Nebraska.

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha (155 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha
DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha (155 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : OMA - Omaha has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2018 5.2 4.5 8 0 0
2017 2.3 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NE · Omaha

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : TVC - Traverse City 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCA Reagan National Airport 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority - Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001258 SDL - 258 SCOTTSDALE AIRPORT 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1520 LOWE S OF N.W. OMAHA NE 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6181 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE 26120001-261201 ST MARYS 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Adelanto 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wheeler 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PA148 Lehigh Valley (Dixie) Easton 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DCA Reagan National Airport 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harvard Bioscience Holliston 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntington Beach Hauling 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMI - Broken Arrow 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Judlau Contracting Inc.- ILL All locations/projects 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.