Support Activities for Air Transportation · Nevada

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno

Reno, NV · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno: 6.2 TCR = 137% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.7

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno's TCR fell 14.7 from 17.4 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Reno, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #25/36
  • PHOTO KON/KOA Airport
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KON/KOA Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno averages 6.2 TCR (137% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno TCR series: 2017=17.4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 36 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Nevada.

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno (34 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno
DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno (34 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : RNO - Reno has fewer employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 17.4 17.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NV · Reno

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KON/KOA Airport 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TYS McGhee Tyson Airport 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prospect Airport Services DEN 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4765-SATCI0767 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE NV Energy-Clark 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE T & V Plaster, Incorporated 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bearden Plastering Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tepcoglass LLC Las Vegas 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR The Lebanon Valley Home 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pak Technologies - Capitol 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 071368-Carbondale Po 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mnm Manufacturing, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : EVV - Evansville 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hostetler sales and construction 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Progreso LMMM Lufkin, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 06018-06-06-SALINAS 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.