MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Texas

DHR Hospitalists

Edinburg, TX · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DHR Hospitalists runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

DHR Hospitalists: 1.8 TCR = 47% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DHR Hospitalists safety composite

DHR Hospitalists scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DHR Hospitalists held a steady TCR band

DHR Hospitalists's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Edinburg, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/82
  • PHOTO Gundersen - Onalaska…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gundersen - Onalaska Clinic, Renal, and SSB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DHR Hospitalists in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DHR Hospitalists averages 1.8 TCR (47% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DHR Hospitalists TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where DHR Hospitalists falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 82 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Texas.

DHR Hospitalists (35 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DHR Hospitalists
DHR Hospitalists (35 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

DHR Hospitalists has fewer employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · TX · Edinburg

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 104 employers in Edinburg, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gundersen - Onalaska Clinic, Renal, and SSB 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graves Gilbert Clinic -FCC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Access Network 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lafayette Family Cancer Center 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doctors Hospital at Renaissance 4,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Rio Grande Valley 3,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-157 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21066000-21066 718 FTE
NAT-TCR 0374 Milwaukie Construction/Tower Crews 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Iochem-OK 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR R C Foster Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Architectural Forest Products LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE WHITEHALL 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Illini Environmental, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orijin Stone 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.