Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing · California

Diamond Foods Inc

Stockton, CA · ~520 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diamond Foods Inc runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Diamond Foods Inc: 4.5 TCR = 109% of Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diamond Foods Inc safety composite

Diamond Foods Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2018→2024

Diamond Foods Inc injury rate improved

Diamond Foods Inc's TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.4 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=5.3 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311911 · Stockton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/34
  • PHOTO Urbancrest, Ohio
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 140 inj
  • SIZE ~520 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Urbancrest, Ohio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Diamond Foods Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diamond Foods Inc averages 4.5 TCR (109% of the Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diamond Foods Inc TCR series: 2018=5.4 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=5.3 · 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Diamond Foods Inc falls in its industry

150 Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 34 Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, employers in California.

Diamond Foods Inc (520 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Diamond Foods Inc
Diamond Foods Inc (520 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Diamond Foods Inc has more employees than the Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 25 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 22 0 0
2021 5.3 3.0 20 3 0
2020 4.6 3.4 14 8 0
2019 7.3 5.4 34 0 0
2018 5.4 4.8 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311911 · CA · Stockton

150 Nuts, salted, roasted, cooked, canned, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Urbancrest, Ohio 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nichols Pistachio 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodland 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PB2 Foods 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 10 520 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 90 520 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 92 520 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 297 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Flex-N-Gate Texas, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Treehouse Foods, INC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Huntsinger Farms, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alta Forest Products Shelton 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Textron Aviation - Independence 520 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco South Florida 520 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell Grocery Corporation 520 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation 520 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.