Structural assemblies, prefabricated wood, merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Structural assemblies, prefabricated wood, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville: 2.6 TCR = 120% of Structural assemblies, prefabricated wood, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville safety composite

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville: 0.0 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 4.18× in 2022

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville's TCR rose 11.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 11.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 4.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #6/25
  • PHOTO Andersen Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andersen Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville averages 2.6 TCR (120% of the Structural assemblies, prefabricated wood, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=11 · BLS 2.2

Where Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville falls in its industry

1,225 Structural assemblies, prefabr establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 25 Structural assemblies, prefabr employers in South Carolina.

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville
Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Diamond Hill Plywood-Greenville has fewer employees than the Structural assemblies, prefabricated woo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.0 11.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · SC · Greenville

1,225 Structural assemblies, prefabricated wood, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andersen Logistics LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GTS Everett 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis - BMD 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klumb Lumber - Greeneville 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRI COUNTY COTTON GROWERS, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartsville Complex 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLYTHEWOOD CREW QUARTERS 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Grinds - Milwaukee WI 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wireless - Bellingham 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 981 - Colma 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 694 - Trexlertown 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4 Wheel Parts - Las Vegas 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Municipal Golf Course 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Z Blinds Co Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Southpoint 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.