Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local · California

Diamondback Express, Inc.

Rialto, CA · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diamondback Express, Inc. runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local workplace, earning a grade A.

Diamondback Express, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 17% of Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diamondback Express, Inc. safety composite

Diamondback Express, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Diamondback Express, Inc.: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 6.03× in 2024

Diamondback Express, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 6.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Rialto, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 17% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #2/110
  • PHOTO GST Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GST Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Diamondback Express, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diamondback Express, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (17% of the Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diamondback Express, Inc. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Diamondback Express, Inc. falls in its industry

1,130 Dry bulk trucking (except garb establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 110 Dry bulk trucking (except garb employers in California.

Diamondback Express, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Diamondback Express, Inc.
Diamondback Express, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Diamondback Express, Inc. has fewer employees than the Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collec median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · CA · Rialto

1,130 Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Rialto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GST Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Tank Lines, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Transport Service, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advantage Tank Lines 20229 Las Vegas 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB7 4,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB7 4,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB8 2,705 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3806 - Rialto CA DC 1,822 FTE
NAT-TCR Aqua Control Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairless Energy, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eli Lilly US AffiliateSales 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 449 - Dodge City 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lewisy Fuel Oil, Inc 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crawford Roofing Experts 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dms - Key West 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wind River Environmental Monroe, CT 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.